House Hunter vs Estate Agent: Unethical Practices of Property Agents

Unethical practices among real estate agents are unfortunately common in the real estate industry. These practices can have serious consequences for buyers, sellers, and renters. Understanding these unethical practices is essential for anyone involved in the real estate market to protect themselves from potential harm.

Check Golden Standard of Partnership

Misleading

One of the most prevalent unethical practices is the dissemination of false or misleading information about properties. Estate agents may intentionally hide defects or issues with a property, such as structural damage, pest infestations, or legal disputes. By doing so, they can make a property appear more attractive to potential buyers or renters, leading them to make decisions based on incomplete or inaccurate information. This can result in buyers purchasing properties that require significant and costly repairs or dealing with legal complications they were unaware of.

The main cause of such practices stems from the business model where, due to low margins, real estate agents try to push every property. This is especially true for properties for which they have an exclusive agreement.

Bait-and-Switch

Another common unethical practice is known as “bait-and-switch.” In this scenario, agents advertise properties at attractive prices to lure in potential buyers or renters. However, when these clients express interest, the advertised property is no longer available, and the agent attempts to steer them towards more expensive options. This tactic not only wastes the clients’ time but also erodes trust in the real estate process. It can lead to frustration and financial strain as clients may feel pressured to settle for less desirable or more costly properties than they initially intended.

A lazy way of attracting clients. Just post an advertisement at a low price and that’s it. How can a client protect themselves from this? At the advertisement level, it’s impossible to determine if this practice is occurring. Choose a person who is focused on the quality of service, especially on understanding your preferences and lifestyle. Individuals who do not attract clients through advertisements will never use this tactic.

Dual Agency Arrangements – conflicts of interest

Agents also frequently engage in conflicts of interest, particularly through dual agency arrangements. Dual agency occurs when a single agent represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. While this is legal in some jurisdictions, it poses a significant conflict of interest as the agent may struggle to fairly represent both parties’ interests. This can result in biased advice and unfair negotiations, ultimately disadvantaging one or both parties involved. Clients may end up paying more or receiving less than they should due to the agent’s divided loyalties.

How to avoid overpaying for a property? It’s very simple. As a buyer, choose an agent who specializes solely in buyer support. A quick online review of their activities usually allows you to determine if such a situation might occur.

Fabrication of Phantom Offers

Some agents also engage in the fabrication of phantom offers. They claim that there are other interested parties or offers on a property to create a sense of urgency and pressure potential buyers to make quick decisions. This manipulation can lead buyers to increase their offers unnecessarily, often resulting in paying more than the property’s market value. Such tactics exploit the emotional aspect of home buying and can lead to regret and financial burden for the buyers.

The only thing we can suggest if your intuition senses pressure being put on you is to take a deep breath and calmly reconsider your situation. By doing this, you will benefit by not losing out and avoiding regret. You can find a suggestion for a solution at the bottom of the page in the FAQ

Pressure tactics

Pressure tactics are also commonly used by unethical agents. They might urge clients to make hasty decisions by claiming that offers are time-sensitive or that many other buyers are interested. This high-pressure environment can lead clients to make rushed decisions without fully considering their options or conducting necessary due diligence. Such tactics can result in financial commitments that clients are not fully prepared for, leading to potential financial hardship.

The same solution as in the previous case. A suggestion for a solution can be found at the bottom of the page in the FAQ.

Delay in new property listings

Withholding listings is another deceitful practice where agents delay listing new properties on the market to benefit themselves or favored clients. This can result in sellers losing potential buyers and possibly settling for lower offers than they might have received in an open, competitive market. It undermines the principle of fair competition and can disadvantage both sellers and genuine buyers.

Both the buyer and the house hunter suffer from this practice.
The best offers go to the ‘inner circle’. The buyer and the house hunter get the leftovers. There is no defence against this practice unless you are part of the ‘inner circle’; then you benefit.

Conclusion

The consequences of these unethical practices are far-reaching. For buyers, they can lead to overpayment, purchasing properties with hidden defects, or facing legal issues they were not prepared for. Sellers can suffer financial losses from undervalued property sales or miss out on better offers due to withheld listings. If you’re a buyer looking to purchase a home in Poland, consider using a buyer’s real estate agent in Poland, also known as a House Hunter.

Trust in the real estate industry is severely eroded by these practices. Clients become wary of engaging with agents, fearing exploitation and dishonesty. This distrust can make the process of buying, selling, or renting properties even more stressful and complicated than it already is. Moreover, it can harm the reputation of ethical agents who are committed to providing honest and professional service.

To combat these issues, it is crucial for clients to be well-informed and vigilant. They should conduct thorough research, seek independent advice, and never feel rushed into making decisions. Transparency and honesty should be demanded in all transactions, and clients should be aware of their rights and the legal recourses available to them in case of malpractice. By staying informed and cautious, clients can better protect themselves from the unethical practices that unfortunately still exist in the real estate industry.

Compare listings

Compare